The random ramblings of andrewg

May 8, 2010

The People’s Party of Northern Ireland

For a debate to exist, there must be at least two sides.

Seymour Major laments that with the UCUNF project on its knees, he is left without a political home. The Alliance Party fits his non-sectarian principles, but not his conservatism. Jeff Peel expresses similar sentiments. After years of neglect, and after being made junior partners in their own political project, local Conservative activists were finally betrayed by their national leadership at Hatfield House, and several potential candidates walked. If normal politics is to survive in Northern Ireland, there can be no repeat of that experience.

The way to change politics in Northern Ireland is to shift the focus of political debate. The sectarian parties have been able to set the agenda by concentrating the debate on issues that suit them. Bread and butter issues such as the economy, education and public services have their airtime squeezed by the endless posturing of identity politics. The Alliance Party has struggled to make itself heard over the noise, and too often allows itself to be drawn into the middle of the sectarian argument, fighting on two fronts.

In order for the political debate in NI to be freed from the stranglehold of sectarianism, another debate must take its place – one which concentrates on bread and butter issues. And for a debate to exist, there must be at least two sides. It may seem paradoxical, but the way to boost the non-sectarian centre ground is to divide it into left and right and ramp the argument up to full volume.

The missing element in this picture is a centre-right equivalent of Alliance, and that’s where our disillusioned Conservative friends come in. They are potentially the core of a new political party – let’s call it the People’s Party after similar ones in other European countries. It would be independent of the Conservatives, although it could ally with them in Westminster in the same way that the Bavarian CSU does with the CDU in Germany. Complementing that arrangement, it would also build links with Fine Gael to co-ordinate policy on cross-border issues. But at its heart it would be a middle-NI party, committed to standing up for the interests of all the people of Northern Ireland, unionist and nationalist alike.

Yes, it would be the natural political home of the garden centre Prod and the Catholic unionist, but only a fool would count on them turning out on polling day. The People’s Party should seek to maximise its potential support – targeting middle- and working-class households, on both sides of the divide. Naomi Long has proved that cross-community parties can garner broad support if they field committed, hard-working candidates. A strong People’s Party with talented members should encourage Alliance to up their game, and vice versa, allowing a mature left-right political debate to evolve. I am convinced that once Northern Ireland voters get a taste of such a debate they will find the sterile us-versus-them politics of the past much less impressive.

7 Comments »

  1. Thank you for this post Andrewg.

    I have more to say on this subject and wont go into detail here. I will make a general comment about the broadcast media in Northern Ireland. There is nothing wrong, for example, with the Analysis provided by the BBC. Actually it is very good but I think that some journalists could, if they wanted to, make bread and butter politics more relevant.

    For example, I recall the first leader’s TV debate in NI, when Gerry Adams was asked about membership of the IRA. Such an old chestnut! The interviewer just seemed to allow the intra-tribal warfares to rage, so we effectively had two separate battles going on which gave the appearance of being unconnected. It would not be difficult for the media to change the line of questioning. I did not see all the broadcast or the second one but I certainly dont remember Gerry Adams being asked about Sinn Fein’s policy on Education.

    Comment by torystoryni — May 8, 2010 @ 6:35 pm | Reply

  2. Great idea, but the stumbling block is the structure of the Assembly. I say this because:
    * Local council elections are irrelevant.
    * Westminster is decreasing in importance as powers are devolved to the Assembly.
    * The Assembly institutionalises the identity politics of the sectarian divide. That has to go if it is ever going to work long term.

    The Alliance party has been extraordinary successful in East Belfast – congratulations to Naomi Long. However, does this indicate a change in how East Belfast will vote in the next Assembly election? I wouldn’t take that for granted…

    PS: If we are going to have regional assemblies/Scottish parliament, we should do it properly and create a federal UK structure, including an English parliament, and have separate tax raising powers for the UK and the individual nations to pay for the public services each is responsible for. Legislatures and executives that spend but do not have to raise the corresponding taxes are a bad idea.

    Comment by Ed — May 8, 2010 @ 6:51 pm | Reply

  3. You should set this party up. I think I would still be voting Alliance, but it would be nice to have someone to talk to who didn’t totally agree with me, but who was also sane.

    Comment by WhyNotSmile — May 8, 2010 @ 7:49 pm | Reply

  4. Seymour,

    I suspect the MSM goes along with the old politics because it’s easy. We in the blogosphere like to think of the media setting the agenda, but in most cases the media gives the public what it thinks they want. That’s not to say there aren’t good counterexamples, of course.

    Ed,

    Yes, the Assembly is biased against cross-community parties. And yes, this has got to go in the long term. But until normal politics is well established, there will be no appetite for removing designation. Chicken and egg. I have said before in this blog that cross-designation is the way around the problem – apparently some in Alliance have argued for it but haven’t made much headway.

    I think it’s a given that at least some of Naomi Long’s vote was against Robinson rather than for her personally. But a seat is a seat. Question is, can she build on her success?

    As for federalism, I’ve been saying that for years.

    WhyNotSmile,

    Being based in Galway, and a member of a Southern political party, I think the most I can offer for now is encouragement. But thanks for confirming my sanity; I wonder about that sometimes.

    Comment by andrewgdotcom — May 8, 2010 @ 8:23 pm | Reply

  5. Andrew,

    Maybe you were sitting in front of a crystal ball when you wrote this piece

    See here

    http://nicentreright.wordpress.com/

    Comment by Seymour Major — June 1, 2010 @ 7:30 pm | Reply

  6. [...] Northern Ireland Centre-Right Party begins Posted on June 3, 2010 by Seymour Major I was not the first blogger to advocate the creation of a new non-designated centre-right political party for Northern Ireland [...]

    Pingback by Campaign for a New Northern Ireland Centre-Right Party begins « Tory Story NI — June 3, 2010 @ 6:11 am | Reply

  7. [...] on the left-right political spectrum and engendering left-right political competition.  As Andrew G has [...]

    Pingback by Summary of Belfast Telegraph Articles on changing Northern Ireland politics | Northern Ireland Centre-Right — July 6, 2010 @ 11:17 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.